So little SISTER. UNC is and always will be the the most storied program in b-ball history

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Shawn Duncan on April 7, 2009 at 10:41am

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by CardzFan79 on April 7, 2009 at 12:39pm

Man please 4 titles from the 40 and 50's and mean spit!!! The Blue hicks have 3 legit titles. UNC will and should pass the blue hick nation

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by scalba123 on April 7, 2009 at 1:59pm

...another example of hillbilly revisionist history.

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by scalba123 on April 7, 2009 at 2:43pm

Does that mean you're going to bore everyone with that heroic Liberty Bowl victory? Small people tend to hold on to small victories, Wildcrap.

WildcatShamrock said:

Aaaaand we're back to the past doesn't matter. Neat.

I can't wait until the Orange Bowl comes back up again!

Permalink Reply by scalba123 on April 7, 2009 at 2:50pm

I took the top four schools in the all-time wins lists (North Carolina, Kentucky, Kansas and Duke...at least that will be the order by next December) and came up with the following decade totals:

1961-1970: Duke 211, Kentucky 208, North Carolina 191, Kansas 181
1971-1980: North Carolina 245, Kentucky 226, Kansas 173, Duke 166
1981-1990: North Carolina 281, Duke 246, Kansas 237, Kentucky 216
1991-2000: Kentucky 293, Kansas 279, Duke 274, North Carolina 268
2001-2009: Kansas 232, Duke 227, North Carolina 203, Kentucky 193

It would appear that Kentucky is basically treading water instead of being an elite program. I would think that UK fans would be worried about Kansas passing you on this list since North Carolina is basically a done deal.

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by Mr_Skandl on April 7, 2009 at 3:40pm

UofL was considered a pretty good school academically in the 40's and 50's, also. Now, it's the place you wind up, when you party your way out of Kentucky or Western. So let's throw out any shred of history the institution might have, and just condemn the wretched place. While we're at it, lets pave over the entire campus. Abandoned Silo-view condos would really add a touch of beauty to the entire area.

Should we rename the Naismith Trophy? After all, Dr. Jack has been dead for years. The Cards are about two years from having no championship success in a quarter of a century. Better write off any of their past achievements as well.

Hell, what was the point of having a US bicentennial celebration in 76'? Furthermore, why are there all of those stupid statues standing in Wash DC? Those are celebrations of history. And according to a few ignorant imbeciles... history has no relevance.

CardzFan79 said:

Man please 4 titles from the 40 and 50's and mean spit!!! The Blue hicks have 3 legit titles. UNC will and should pass the blue hick nation

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by Shawn Duncan on April 7, 2009 at 4:41pm

What an ignorant fool you are Scotty!

Allow me to add these totals you gave us for the top 4 basketball schools of all time.

From 1961-2009, according to Scott Bailey, these are your totals.

North Carolina-1188 wins
Kentucky-1136 wins
Duke- 1124 wins
Kansas- 1102 wins

You claim that since "real" basketball started in the 1960's, we are "treading water." We've won 52 less games than Carolina in a 49 year stretch. That's less than 1 win per season that Carolina has averaged over Ky since 1961. Duke and Kansas have won 12 and 34 less games than Ky since 1961. I think you'd probably be the only idiot who would consider these statistics as "treading water." Your jealousy of the UK program is being shown more than ever Scotty. Have fun cheering for little brother. By the way, if you really want to give us all a good laugh, list UL's win totals for those same 5 decades.
scalba123 said:

I took the top four schools in the all-time wins lists (North Carolina, Kentucky, Kansas and Duke...at least that will be the order by next December) and came up with the following decade totals:

1961-1970: Duke 211, Kentucky 208, North Carolina 191, Kansas 181
1971-1980: North Carolina 245, Kentucky 226, Kansas 173, Duke 166
1981-1990: North Carolina 281, Duke 246, Kansas 237, Kentucky 216
1991-2000: Kentucky 293, Kansas 279, Duke 274, North Carolina 268
2001-2009: Kansas 232, Duke 227, North Carolina 203, Kentucky 193

It would appear that Kentucky is basically treading water instead of being an elite program. I would think that UK fans would be worried about Kansas passing you on this list since North Carolina is basically a done deal.

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by scalba123 on April 7, 2009 at 5:09pm

I see that Shawn (once again) allowed his ignorance to infest this board. I did not claim that real basketball started in the 1960s. I only stopped there since I was doing these computations by hand. I find it interesting that you claim Kentucky is an elite program yet as only "won" one decade since the 1960s.

But then again, you're never one to let facts get in the way of showing your stupidity. At least everyone is starting to recognize that the depths of your comments are as shallow as your gene pool.

Shawn Duncan said:

What an ignorant fool you are Scotty!

Allow me to add these totals you gave us for the top 4 basketball schools of all time.

From 1961-2009, according to Scott Bailey, these are your totals.

North Carolina-1188 wins
Kentucky-1136 wins
Duke- 1124 wins
Kansas- 1102 wins

You claim that since "real" basketball started in the 1960's, we are "treading water." We've won 52 less games than Carolina in a 49 year stretch. That's less than 1 win per season that Carolina has averaged over Ky since 1961. Duke and Kansas have won 12 and 34 less games than Ky since 1961. I think you'd probably be the only idiot who would consider these statistics as "treading water." Your jealousy of the UK program is being shown more than ever Scotty. Have fun cheering for little brother. By the way, if you really want to give us all a good laugh, list UL's win totals for those same 5 decades.
scalba123 said:

I took the top four schools in the all-time wins lists (North Carolina, Kentucky, Kansas and Duke...at least that will be the order by next December) and came up with the following decade totals:

1961-1970: Duke 211, Kentucky 208, North Carolina 191, Kansas 181
1971-1980: North Carolina 245, Kentucky 226, Kansas 173, Duke 166
1981-1990: North Carolina 281, Duke 246, Kansas 237, Kentucky 216
1991-2000: Kentucky 293, Kansas 279, Duke 274, North Carolina 268
2001-2009: Kansas 232, Duke 227, North Carolina 203, Kentucky 193

It would appear that Kentucky is basically treading water instead of being an elite program. I would think that UK fans would be worried about Kansas passing you on this list since North Carolina is basically a done deal.

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by scalba123 on April 7, 2009 at 5:24pm

...since Shawn is so curious about Louisville's win totals for the past five decades:

1961-1970 Louisville 178 v. Kentucky 208 (advantage Kentucky)
1971-1980 Louisville 240 v. Kentucky 226 (advantage Louisville)
1981-1990 Louisville 237 v. Kentucky 216 (advantage Louisville)
1991-2000 Louisville 198 v. Kentucky 293 (advantage Kentucky)
2001-2009 Louisville 200 v. Kentucky 193 (advantage Louisville)

Except for the 1990 when RICK PITINO was your head coach, Kentucky has treading water against Louisville. Those are the facts, Shawn. Maybe next time you can actually do some research before acting like a laughable stereotype.

Shawn Duncan said:

What an ignorant fool you are Scotty!

Allow me to add these totals you gave us for the top 4 basketball schools of all time.

From 1961-2009, according to Scott Bailey, these are your totals.

North Carolina-1188 wins
Kentucky-1136 wins
Duke- 1124 wins
Kansas- 1102 wins

You claim that since "real" basketball started in the 1960's, we are "treading water." We've won 52 less games than Carolina in a 49 year stretch. That's less than 1 win per season that Carolina has averaged over Ky since 1961. Duke and Kansas have won 12 and 34 less games than Ky since 1961. I think you'd probably be the only idiot who would consider these statistics as "treading water." Your jealousy of the UK program is being shown more than ever Scotty. Have fun cheering for little brother. By the way, if you really want to give us all a good laugh, list UL's win totals for those same 5 decades.
scalba123 said:

I took the top four schools in the all-time wins lists (North Carolina, Kentucky, Kansas and Duke...at least that will be the order by next December) and came up with the following decade totals:

1961-1970: Duke 211, Kentucky 208, North Carolina 191, Kansas 181
1971-1980: North Carolina 245, Kentucky 226, Kansas 173, Duke 166
1981-1990: North Carolina 281, Duke 246, Kansas 237, Kentucky 216
1991-2000: Kentucky 293, Kansas 279, Duke 274, North Carolina 268
2001-2009: Kansas 232, Duke 227, North Carolina 203, Kentucky 193

It would appear that Kentucky is basically treading water instead of being an elite program. I would think that UK fans would be worried about Kansas passing you on this list since North Carolina is basically a done deal.

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by Shawn Duncan on April 7, 2009 at 8:01pm

It looks to me like we have 83 more wins than you in your little time frame that you listed. If I'm not mistaken, we also hold the all time series lead 26-14. That's what I call total domination. Now go play in traffic Scotty!
scalba123 said:

...since Shawn is so curious about Louisville's win totals for the past five decades:

1961-1970 Louisville 178 v. Kentucky 208 (advantage Kentucky)
1971-1980 Louisville 240 v. Kentucky 226 (advantage Louisville)
1981-1990 Louisville 237 v. Kentucky 216 (advantage Louisville)
1991-2000 Louisville 198 v. Kentucky 293 (advantage Kentucky)
2001-2009 Louisville 200 v. Kentucky 193 (advantage Louisville)

Except for the 1990 when RICK PITINO was your head coach, Kentucky has treading water against Louisville. Those are the facts, Shawn. Maybe next time you can actually do some research before acting like a laughable stereotype.

Shawn Duncan said:

What an ignorant fool you are Scotty!

Allow me to add these totals you gave us for the top 4 basketball schools of all time.

From 1961-2009, according to Scott Bailey, these are your totals.

North Carolina-1188 wins
Kentucky-1136 wins
Duke- 1124 wins
Kansas- 1102 wins

You claim that since "real" basketball started in the 1960's, we are "treading water." We've won 52 less games than Carolina in a 49 year stretch. That's less than 1 win per season that Carolina has averaged over Ky since 1961. Duke and Kansas have won 12 and 34 less games than Ky since 1961. I think you'd probably be the only idiot who would consider these statistics as "treading water." Your jealousy of the UK program is being shown more than ever Scotty. Have fun cheering for little brother. By the way, if you really want to give us all a good laugh, list UL's win totals for those same 5 decades.
scalba123 said:

I took the top four schools in the all-time wins lists (North Carolina, Kentucky, Kansas and Duke...at least that will be the order by next December) and came up with the following decade totals:

1961-1970: Duke 211, Kentucky 208, North Carolina 191, Kansas 181
1971-1980: North Carolina 245, Kentucky 226, Kansas 173, Duke 166
1981-1990: North Carolina 281, Duke 246, Kansas 237, Kentucky 216
1991-2000: Kentucky 293, Kansas 279, Duke 274, North Carolina 268
2001-2009: Kansas 232, Duke 227, North Carolina 203, Kentucky 193

It would appear that Kentucky is basically treading water instead of being an elite program. I would think that UK fans would be worried about Kansas passing you on this list since North Carolina is basically a done deal.

Shawn Duncan said:

I think they need two more titles, and then you can come talk to me. We have two more titles than them, and more all time victories. What are you basing your most storied program title on?

Permalink Reply by Lisa on April 7, 2009 at 9:20pm

Actually I think that would be UCLA, which has 11 titles.

Permalink Reply by scalba123 on April 7, 2009 at 9:33pm

I don’t happen to obsess about the past like UK fans. They desperately cling to the NCAA tournament championships from the 1940s and 1950s like it actually means something. Let’s face it; fans of this school have nothing meaningful in their pathetic lives, so they will grasp at anything at gives them some sense of purpose. Why do you think Shawn Duncan is so willing to make a complete ass out of himself every time he posts something on this site?

Because his life has absolutely no meaning outside of this dying basketball program.

The past does matter…if it has relevance. But there is a difference between relevance and blind obsession. I wish UK fans would spend the same energy in looking for a job, taking care of their children or even bathing that they do over their “elite” program. You need to realize that UK fans are looked upon nationwide as lower than illegal immigrants. I’m not trying to be negative (sorry to burst your bubble, Shawn), but I deal with people from coast to coast on a daily basis…and that is the consistent opinion about you people.

Maybe you should individual clean up your act first before you start acting like you’ve accomplished something. Or better yet, accomplish something on a person basis instead of relying on something that occurred over fifty years ago.

And now for a little dose of honesty…

Louisville backed into that Orange Bowl victory.

That’s the difference between proper people (me) and white trash (you). We deal with facts and are able to formulate a logical conclusion. You take the southern approach and reach into the past (i.e., the Civil War).


WildcatShamrock said:

I just find it remarkably hypocritical of you UL fans who say - day in and day out - that UK's 7 National Championships don't matter, the all-time win list in basketball and football don't matter. All I hear is "the past doesn't matter, the past doesn't matter, live in the 'now'." And yet, in the very next thread on the list, someone else will be talking about the Orange Bowl or a CWS appearance. It's hilarious seeing the incompetence in some people's debate skills, you, for one, are a leader in that assemblage; don't try to deny it.

scalba123 said:

Does that mean you're going to bore everyone with that heroic Liberty Bowl victory? Small people tend to hold on to small victories, Wildcrap.

WildcatShamrock said:

Aaaaand we're back to the past doesn't matter. Neat.

I can't wait until the Orange Bowl comes back up again!

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 5
• Next ›
• Page