WHY are UL fans ignoring the question?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by larrywb59 on October 26, 2009 at 8:04pm

hey I am not the one that brought up the directors cup I just responded to it, and who is the last team to win a CHAMPIONSHIP lol, I was not trying to be rude just a honest response, with factual evidence

cardfan75 said:

hey larry wilburn who was ranked in the most recent? UL NUMBER 1 team in america. they got beat by a better prepared team. The same team that beat your arses when UL went to the final 4.

larrywb59 said:

here is a link for you look at every year since the director's cup started and you will see the average ranking is UK 40.5, UL average ranking is 100.5

http://www.nacda.com/directorscup/nacda-directorscup-previous-scori...

. I mean if you want to say 3 time out of the last 10 years is UL being ranked the majority of the time, there is something wrong with your math skills lol

TomNationwide said:

http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/nacda/sports/directorscup/auto_...

Check that out sparky that's last years rankings for all college teams in all sports. The reason Louisville never acknowledges your type is because the University of Louisville is currently, and for the last 10 years, better. I'm not certain the weights that the NCAA puts on sports is correct or not but according to the last 10 years the NCAA even says UL is a better Athletic Program.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by scalba123 on October 26, 2009 at 9:31pm

Actually we're just ignoring the mindless, stereotypical idiot that is asking these questions. Try to improve your education and status in life first before running with the successful adults...

...and getting your GED doesn't qualify.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Shawn Duncan on October 26, 2009 at 9:38pm

I don't blame you for ignoring him, Scabbie. If you actually tried to address his questions about your pathetic program, you'd have to admit he's right. No championships in almost a quarter century, one final four in that same time span, and only one conference title in thirteen years. So sad.....

scalba123 said:

Actually we're just ignoring the mindless, stereotypical idiot that is asking these questions. Try to improve your education and status in life first before running with the successful adults...

...and getting your GED doesn't qualify.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Tim Nickels (fna) halfadime on October 26, 2009 at 11:15pm

OK. I will go ahead and speak on this even though its an absolute waste of time. Louisville Basketball has been a major basketball program since the moment Denny Crum took them over. Have they had the success of UCLA, UNC, and UK; few have. They ruled the 80s, they stunk in the 90s and over the last several years they have made huge steps to becoming a major player again. Under Pitino they have been to two elite eights and a final four.

Yes Kentucky has seven titles (four of them before the 60s) verses two for U of L, but U of L was a mid-major program until the 80s. UK has been a major player (and a major cheater) for the majority of it's history. They have 11 final fours (six coming before the 70s) to U of L's 8 (all but one during or after the 70s.) Louisville has two elite eights and one final four in the last five seasons (yes there was an NIT in that span, but UK has one as well.)

UK does have one more post 60s title than Louisville, however they have been largely irrelevant in the basketball world for the last several years, not having been to the final four in 11 years. Yes they are headed back up under Calipari, but U of L has been up barring one season for the last 5 years.

I look forward to the rivalry of upcoming years. But to call Lousville a mid-major program when they have nearly matched Kentucky over the last 40 years is just stupid. Let the numbers speak.

Titles since 1970 - U of L (2) UK (3) (also UK deserves credit for 2 title game losses)
Final Fours since 1970 - U of L (7) UK (7)
Elite Eights since 1970 - U of L (10) UK (18)
Sweet 16s since 1970 - U of L (19) UK (23)

While UK has the edge in almost every category, I do not think that they have proven to be lightyears ahead over the last 40 years. Anyone that wants to argue before 1970, most of you weren't even born yet, and we know Rupp was a cheater, plus basketball was less relevant, so shut up!

Shawn Duncan said:

I don't blame you for ignoring him, Scabbie. If you actually tried to address his questions about your pathetic program, you'd have to admit he's right. No championships in almost a quarter century, one final four in that same time span, and only one conference title in thirteen years. So sad.....

scalba123 said:

Actually we're just ignoring the mindless, stereotypical idiot that is asking these questions. Try to improve your education and status in life first before running with the successful adults...

...and getting your GED doesn't qualify.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Tim Nickels (fna) halfadime on October 26, 2009 at 11:38pm

By the way before any UK fans try and go to the head to head series and UKs 26-14 edge it is worth noting that 11 of those losses have come since the series renewed in the 80s. UK leads the modern series 17-11 (4-4 since Pitino came to town) Yes UK is better, but recent history shows U of L has been competitive. They are no mid-major. Consider this mid-major argument destroyed.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Brad Canaday on October 26, 2009 at 11:44pm

Great Post!!!

ITALLPETRINOSFAULT!!! said:

OK. I will go ahead and speak on this even though its an absolute waste of time. Louisville Basketball has been a major basketball program since the moment Denny Crum took them over. Have they had the success of UCLA, UNC, and UK; few have. They ruled the 80s, they stunk in the 90s and over the last several years they have made huge steps to becoming a major player again. Under Pitino they have been to two elite eights and a final four.

Yes Kentucky has seven titles (four of them before the 60s) verses two for U of L, but U of L was a mid-major program until the 80s. UK has been a major player (and a major cheater) for the majority of it's history. They have 11 final fours (six coming before the 70s) to U of L's 8 (all but one during or after the 70s.) Louisville has two elite eights and one final four in the last five seasons (yes there was an NIT in that span, but UK has one as well.)

UK does have one more post 60s title than Louisville, however they have been largely irrelevant in the basketball world for the last several years, not having been to the final four in 11 years. Yes they are headed back up under Calipari, but U of L has been up barring one season for the last 5 years.

I look forward to the rivalry of upcoming years. But to call Lousville a mid-major program when they have nearly matched Kentucky over the last 40 years is just stupid. Let the numbers speak.

Titles since 1970 - U of L (2) UK (3) (also UK deserves credit for 2 title game losses)
Final Fours since 1970 - U of L (7) UK (7)
Elite Eights since 1970 - U of L (10) UK (18)
Sweet 16s since 1970 - U of L (19) UK (23)

While UK has the edge in almost every category, I do not think that they have proven to be lightyears ahead over the last 40 years. Anyone that wants to argue before 1970, most of you weren't even born yet, and we know Rupp was a cheater, plus basketball was less relevant, so shut up!

Shawn Duncan said:

I don't blame you for ignoring him, Scabbie. If you actually tried to address his questions about your pathetic program, you'd have to admit he's right. No championships in almost a quarter century, one final four in that same time span, and only one conference title in thirteen years. So sad.....

scalba123 said:

Actually we're just ignoring the mindless, stereotypical idiot that is asking these questions. Try to improve your education and status in life first before running with the successful adults...

...and getting your GED doesn't qualify.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Tim Nickels (fna) halfadime on October 26, 2009 at 11:56pm

Thanks.

Another thought did this "specimen of human intelligence" actually mention Indiana in the same breath at UNC, Duke, UCLA and UK? Please. :-l They have one title in the last 22 years. WOW!! They are MILES ahead of U of L!!!

If we were arguing football I would agree, U of L does resemble a mid-major. A mid-major with something the "NOT MID-MAJOR" Wildcats do not have, a BCS win, and an edge in the modern series. (U of L leads 9-7) Enjoy UK, you are not a football mid-major like U of L. You are just the whipping boys for every decent team you play.

Brad Canaday said:

Great Post!!!

ITALLPETRINOSFAULT!!! said:

OK. I will go ahead and speak on this even though its an absolute waste of time. Louisville Basketball has been a major basketball program since the moment Denny Crum took them over. Have they had the success of UCLA, UNC, and UK; few have. They ruled the 80s, they stunk in the 90s and over the last several years they have made huge steps to becoming a major player again. Under Pitino they have been to two elite eights and a final four.

Yes Kentucky has seven titles (four of them before the 60s) verses two for U of L, but U of L was a mid-major program until the 80s. UK has been a major player (and a major cheater) for the majority of it's history. They have 11 final fours (six coming before the 70s) to U of L's 8 (all but one during or after the 70s.) Louisville has two elite eights and one final four in the last five seasons (yes there was an NIT in that span, but UK has one as well.)

UK does have one more post 60s title than Louisville, however they have been largely irrelevant in the basketball world for the last several years, not having been to the final four in 11 years. Yes they are headed back up under Calipari, but U of L has been up barring one season for the last 5 years.

I look forward to the rivalry of upcoming years. But to call Lousville a mid-major program when they have nearly matched Kentucky over the last 40 years is just stupid. Let the numbers speak.

Titles since 1970 - U of L (2) UK (3) (also UK deserves credit for 2 title game losses)
Final Fours since 1970 - U of L (7) UK (7)
Elite Eights since 1970 - U of L (10) UK (18)
Sweet 16s since 1970 - U of L (19) UK (23)

While UK has the edge in almost every category, I do not think that they have proven to be lightyears ahead over the last 40 years. Anyone that wants to argue before 1970, most of you weren't even born yet, and we know Rupp was a cheater, plus basketball was less relevant, so shut up!

Shawn Duncan said:

I don't blame you for ignoring him, Scabbie. If you actually tried to address his questions about your pathetic program, you'd have to admit he's right. No championships in almost a quarter century, one final four in that same time span, and only one conference title in thirteen years. So sad.....

scalba123 said:

Actually we're just ignoring the mindless, stereotypical idiot that is asking these questions. Try to improve your education and status in life first before running with the successful adults...

...and getting your GED doesn't qualify.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Tim Nickels (fna) halfadime on October 27, 2009 at 12:09am

I would like to acknowledge one math error. UK has 13 final fours not 11, but it does not change the modern numbers being tied 7-7.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Steve Scarlot on October 27, 2009 at 9:33am

Just wait..... Pretty soon, you'll be making excuses why Lousiville football is kicking UKs ass. Change is coming.....
I will admit that UK basketball, taken over the ENTIRE history of the program, has been stronger than UofL.
I hope Calipari is good therapy for the Gilespie era depression. He should be fun to watch.

Haljordan34 said:

poor loserville. they want to be UP on the porch with the big dogs soooo bad.


listen wayne..or loserville boy...or loserville scum...or WANNA BE ...which ever one you prefer to be called...

no basketball program can be called ELITE when you havent had a championship in 23 yrs.....when you have had only 1 final four in 23 yrs. when you can only win your conference title ONE time in 13 seasons lol HAHAHA.... ALL OF WHAT I JUST SAID IS FACT.

I ASK AGAIN.....OUTSIDE OF 1980-1986 WHAT HAS YOUR PATHETIC PROGRAM DONE? LOL I BET YOU WONT ANSWER....BECAUSE YOU CANT ANSWER HAHAHAHAHA


NOW RUN ALONG YOU "WANNA BE SCUM" HAHAHA IM GOING TO HAVE SOME BEERS WITH SOME UNC AND DUKE AND INDIANA FANS TO DISCUSS WHAT IT IS LIKE BEING A FAN OF AN "ELITE BASKETBALL PROGRAM" HHAHAHAHA

OH AND ANYTIME YOU WANT TO MEET FOR A BEER. JUST SAY SO.


BYE NOW...........WANNA BE SCUM! HAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHA OH YEAH DONT FORGET. 26-14 UK OWNS YOU...LOL HAHAHAHA IT JUST KEEPS GETTING WORSE AND WORSE DOESNT IT? WANNA BE! LOL

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Chris L on October 27, 2009 at 9:46am

Uk wins its conference every season? Since when? Top 25 every year? How about last year. Stupid question posed by and even stupider YOU KAY fan.

Answer me this. Why does YOU KAY always end up on NCAA Probation about every 5 years?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jason Barrett on October 27, 2009 at 11:54am

Well buddy i have to prove you wrong 1 conference title in 13 years i dont know where you got that but if your meaning regular season and or conference tournament titles then we defenately have 4. Also 4 of your 7 NCAA championships came when the NIT was a more prestigous tournament

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Trumpster on October 27, 2009 at 12:59pm

Don't be hatin' on theCARDS, Hal simply because you wish to join the ranks of the schools you mentioned. Of late a WildKat on the Road to the Final 4 ain't been nuthin' but Road Kill, baby! "Da'Ville has been to the Final 4 and 2 Elite Eights since the last time you flossed that tooth! Now sit down, behave and try to make some sense! GoCARDS!!!

▶ Reply to This

▶ Reply to This

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page